TinyFish vs Aerolink: Free Credits, Pricing & Eligibility Compared (2026)

Choosing between TinyFish and Aerolink comes down to your technical workload. Aerolink gives you a fixed $100 credit for standard cloud infrastructure, while TinyFish provides free API credits tailored for browser automation and web agents. Here is how their starter offers compare so you can pick the right credits for your stack.

TinyFish vs Aerolink: Key Differences and Credit Value

Comparing TinyFish and Aerolink requires evaluating two completely different developer tools. Aerolink provides a clear monetary value upfront for general cloud tasks, whereas TinyFish focuses on specialized web automation tasks.

Credit Offer Breakdown and Pricing Structure

Aerolink provides an explicit $100 starter credit designed for general cloud usage. This credit covers core developer needs like compute instances, storage buckets, and networking. Because the credit is quantified upfront, founders can calculate exact runway extensions before putting a card on file.

TinyFish takes a usage-based approach by offering free Web Agent API credits. While the exact dollar ceiling is not publicly fixed, these credits allow developers to test autonomous browser workflows, scraping pipelines, and AI web tasks without paying initial usage fees.

Use Cases: Web Automation vs Cloud Infrastructure

TinyFish is built specifically for agentic browser interactions. If your application relies on automated web navigation, headless browser data extraction, or autonomous agent execution, TinyFish credits directly lower your specialized API overhead.

Aerolink serves as general-purpose backend infrastructure. If you need standard cloud servers, application hosting, or database instances, Aerolink's $100 credit is far more useful for your day-to-day hosting expenses.

• Choose TinyFish if: You are building web scrapers, AI browser agents, or multi-step web action flows.
• Choose Aerolink if: You need basic server hosting, compute units, or core cloud backend resources.
• Choose both if: You run an AI startup that needs backend hosting on Aerolink and browser API execution on TinyFish.

Usage Rules, Expiry, and Cost Traps

Understanding how both platforms bill usage prevents unexpected charges when promotional credits run out. Here is what developers should watch for when deploying workloads on either service.

How API Usage and Cloud Resource Billing Work

TinyFish meters consumption through API calls, session runtime, and task executions. Long-running browser sessions or complex agent tasks will consume credits faster than simple single-page requests.

Aerolink meters usage like a standard cloud platform, deducting compute hours, storage GBs, and egress bandwidth from your $100 balance. Once the $100 credit balance reaches zero, active instances will default to standard billing rates.

1. Monitor session lengths: Set hard execution timeouts on TinyFish tasks so failing browser loops do not exhaust credits.
2. Track resource sizes: Provision smaller compute instances on Aerolink to stretch the $100 credit across several months.
3. Set up alerts: Enable billing notifications on both platforms before launching production workloads.

Hidden Traps and Overages to Prevent

With web agent APIs like TinyFish, failed runs or endless execution loops can still burn usage credits. Make sure your scripts catch errors early to avoid paying for broken agent steps.

With cloud hosts like Aerolink, promotional credits generally do not apply to third-party software add-ons, domain registrations, or bandwidth spikes beyond free tier limits. Keep your test workloads strictly within basic compute boundaries.

• Unused cloud credits on Aerolink typically expire after a standard promotional period.
• Free API credits cannot be transferred between personal and team workspace accounts.
• Neither offer is stackable with duplicate promotional codes on a single account.